Use a computer

For full performance and fluidity, please open Pay Engineers on a desktop or laptop. On mobile, the experience is limited — especially authenticated sections and advanced tools after login.

Payment Infrastructure

Open Banking Rails

AISP / PISP connectivity

Presentation

Overview

Open banking gives regulated third parties the ability to retrieve account data and initiate payments directly from a customer bank account, with the customer explicit consent, under frameworks such as PSD2 in Europe and equivalent regimes elsewhere. Pay Engineers builds the technical integration layer that lets your product make use of these capabilities reliably, at scale and in a way that satisfies both regulators and the banks you connect to.

In practice, open banking connectivity is messier than the standards suggest. Every bank implements the underlying specifications with subtle differences, error handling varies enormously, and strong customer authentication flows must be handled gracefully across dozens or hundreds of institutions. We absorb that complexity so your product team can work against a single, normalised interface.

We work with both direct bank integrations and established aggregators, choosing the right mix based on your target markets, required coverage and tolerance for aggregator fees versus integration effort.

Who This Is For

  • Fintechs building account-to-account payment initiation as an alternative to card payments
  • Lenders, budgeting apps and financial management tools that need account information data with user consent
  • PSPs wanting to offer open banking payments alongside card acceptance
  • Businesses evaluating whether to integrate directly with banks or through an aggregator, and needing an informed technical assessment

What You Get

  • Consent management flows that correctly capture, store and allow revocation of customer permissions in line with regulatory requirements
  • AIS data normalisation, translating inconsistent bank responses into a single, predictable data model for your product
  • PIS initiation flows covering single and, where supported, recurring account-to-account payments
  • SCA handoffs correctly implemented so customers are redirected to and returned from their bank authentication flow without friction or data loss

Technical Approach

The integration layer is built in Laravel, using OAuth2 for the authorisation flows that underpin both account information and payment initiation consent. Where aggregators are used, we integrate against Open Banking APIs and, in relevant European markets, Berlin Group specifications, wrapping their differences behind a consistent internal interface so your product never needs to know which underlying method served a given bank.

Consent state, token lifecycles and renewal requirements are modelled explicitly, since consent expiry and renewal is one of the most common sources of broken user experiences in open banking products. Error handling is designed defensively, given how inconsistently banks report failures, timeouts and unsupported operations, so your product can degrade gracefully rather than surfacing raw upstream errors to end users.

Delivery Process

  • Discovery of your target markets, required bank coverage and choice between direct integration and aggregator
  • Consent and data model design covering AIS and PIS flows relevant to your product
  • Sprint-based build of the integration layer, tested against sandbox environments from banks or your chosen aggregator
  • SCA flow testing across representative banks to confirm redirect and authentication handling works smoothly
  • Phased rollout starting with priority banks or markets before expanding coverage

Outcomes and Benefits

  • A single, normalised interface for account data and payment initiation regardless of underlying bank quirks
  • Lower payment acceptance costs compared with card rails for account-to-account use cases
  • Compliant consent handling that stands up to regulatory and audit scrutiny
  • A foundation that can expand bank coverage or add new open banking use cases without renegotiating your core architecture

Technologies

OAuth2 Laravel Open Banking APIs Berlin Group

FAQ

AISP (account information) connectivity lets you retrieve consented account and transaction data from a user's bank, typically for affordability checks, financial dashboards or reconciliation, while PISP (payment initiation) connectivity lets you initiate a payment directly from a user's bank account, typically as a lower-cost alternative to card payments. Many businesses need both, for example using AISP to verify account ownership before initiating a PISP payment, and we scope the combination that fits your use case during discovery rather than assuming both are required. Regulatory permissions and licensing differ between the two, so we clarify early which your business model actually needs. This avoids over-scoping the licensing and technical work.
Rather than integrating each bank's API individually, we typically connect through an open banking aggregator that provides normalised connectivity across the banks relevant to your target markets, while designing the integration layer so you are not permanently locked into a single aggregator. Where direct bank connectivity is preferable for specific high-volume banks, we support that as a hybrid approach. We account for the reality that bank API reliability and behaviour varies significantly, building retry, fallback and clear error surfacing into the payment initiation flow so a single bank's instability does not degrade your whole product experience. This pragmatic approach reflects how open banking actually performs in production, not just in documentation.
Operating as an AISP or PISP under PSD2 or equivalent regulation typically requires your own authorisation, or a partnership with an already-authorised open banking provider or aggregator under an agent or technical services model. We build the platform to work under either approach, and coordinate with your legal and compliance advisors so the technical consent flows, data retention and audit logging match what your specific regulatory position requires. Consent management, in particular, has specific regulatory expectations around renewal, revocation and scope that we implement directly rather than treating as a UI afterthought. This is an area where the technical and regulatory design need to be developed together, not sequentially.
Payment initiation success rates vary by bank and market, and we design the checkout flow to be transparent about this, offering a fallback payment method rather than leaving a user stuck if their bank's open banking flow fails or times out. We build monitoring specifically around per-bank success rates so you can identify and escalate systemic issues with a particular institution rather than discovering problems only through user complaints. Retry and status polling logic is implemented to handle the asynchronous nature of payment initiation, since confirmation can take longer than a typical card authorisation. This realistic approach to reliability is what makes open banking rails usable in production rather than just in a demo.
A first release covering PISP payment initiation for your primary target market through an aggregator partner typically takes 3 to 4 months, including consent flow design, checkout integration and reconciliation. Adding AISP account information retrieval or expanding to additional markets is usually a smaller subsequent phase once the core consent and initiation flow is proven. Aggregator partner onboarding and any required regulatory registration can run in parallel with technical development to compress overall time to launch. We plan the schedule around your specific aggregator's own onboarding timeline, which we factor in during discovery.

Similar services