Use a computer

For full performance and fluidity, please open Pay Engineers on a desktop or laptop. On mobile, the experience is limited — especially authenticated sections and advanced tools after login.

Compliance & Risk

Fraud & Risk Engine

Rules, scores and case management

Presentation

Overview

Fraud prevention is a balancing act between blocking bad transactions and preserving approval rates on good ones, and getting that balance wrong in either direction has a direct cost: too aggressive, and you lose legitimate revenue and frustrate customers; too permissive, and fraud losses and chargebacks erode margins. Pay Engineers builds fraud and risk engines that give you precise, adjustable control over that balance in real time.

The engine combines deterministic rules, velocity checks and configurable step-up policies for 3-D Secure challenges, so the vast majority of transactions are decisioned automatically in milliseconds, while genuinely ambiguous cases are routed to a human analyst rather than either auto-approved or auto-declined by a rigid rule.

We treat policy as a living asset that must be adjustable quickly as fraud patterns shift, but also fully auditable, since risk and compliance teams need to know exactly what policy was in force for any transaction under later review.

Who This Is For

  • PSPs, acquirers and merchants experiencing fraud losses or chargebacks above acceptable thresholds
  • Businesses whose current risk approach is either overly manual or overly rigid, with no middle ground
  • Platforms wanting to reduce unnecessary 3-D Secure friction on low-risk transactions while maintaining strong protection on high-risk ones
  • Fraud and risk teams needing proper case management tooling rather than working from raw transaction logs

What You Get

  • Real-time scoring evaluating each transaction against configurable risk signals within the latency budget authorisation flows demand
  • Velocity rules detecting abnormal patterns in transaction frequency, amount or behaviour across cards, devices and accounts
  • Case management giving fraud analysts a focused queue of borderline transactions, with the context needed to decide quickly
  • Policy versioning so every rule change is tracked, attributable and reversible if it does not perform as expected

Technical Approach

The engine is built on Laravel with Redis powering the low-latency velocity checks and counters that real-time scoring depends on, since fraud decisions at authorisation time must complete within a strict latency budget without becoming the bottleneck in your checkout flow. A dedicated rule engine evaluates configurable policies against each transaction, combining deterministic rules with weighted scoring so that no single signal alone determines an outcome.

Where machine learning is appropriate, we build hooks that allow model-derived scores to feed into the same policy engine as rule-based signals, so your risk team can blend statistical models with explicit business rules rather than treating them as separate, disconnected systems. Case management tooling surfaces the specific signals that triggered a review, not just a raw score, so analysts can make fast, informed decisions instead of reverse-engineering why a transaction was flagged.

Delivery Process

  • Discovery of your current fraud losses, chargeback patterns and existing rule or vendor setup
  • Risk policy design covering rules, velocity checks and step-up authentication thresholds tailored to your risk appetite
  • Sprint-based build of the scoring engine, followed by case management tooling for your analyst team
  • Shadow-mode testing, running the new engine alongside your existing process to compare outcomes before cutover
  • Phased rollout with close monitoring of approval rates and fraud metrics during the transition

Outcomes and Benefits

  • Reduced fraud losses and chargebacks without a proportional loss in approval rates on legitimate transactions
  • Faster, better-informed analyst decisions through focused case queues rather than raw log review
  • The ability to react quickly to emerging fraud patterns through policy changes rather than engineering releases
  • A fully auditable policy history, valuable for scheme, regulatory or internal risk committee review

Technologies

Laravel Redis Rule engine ML hooks

FAQ

The engine supports configurable rule-based checks, such as velocity limits, geolocation mismatches and device fingerprinting, alongside statistical or machine-learning risk scoring models that assign a risk score to each transaction in real time. We typically start with a solid rule-based foundation, since rules are transparent, fast to tune and easy for your risk team to understand, and layer in scoring models once sufficient transaction history exists to train them effectively. Rules and models work together, with scores feeding into rule thresholds and rules able to override scores for known high-confidence scenarios. This hybrid approach avoids the common failure mode of deploying a black-box model your risk team cannot explain or adjust when it misbehaves.
Every fraud rule and scoring threshold is tuned against your historical transaction data to measure both fraud capture rate and false positive rate, since a rule that blocks fraud but also blocks a meaningful share of legitimate transactions is often a net loss for the business. We build reporting that tracks this balance explicitly over time, so your risk team can see the real business impact of any threshold change before and after it is applied. Step-up friction, such as additional authentication, is preferred over outright blocking wherever the risk score allows it, giving legitimate customers a path to complete their transaction rather than a dead end. This calibration is an ongoing process, not a one-time configuration, and we build the tooling to support that iteration.
Flagged transactions are routed into a case management queue with the relevant transaction, customer and risk score context presented together, so your fraud analysts can make a decision quickly without hunting across multiple systems. Cases can be escalated, assigned, resolved or referred for further investigation, and every decision is logged with the analyst and rationale, which supports both internal quality review and any later regulatory or dispute enquiry. We build dashboards summarising case volume, resolution time and outcome patterns, which helps identify emerging fraud trends before they show up as a large loss. This turns fraud review from an ad hoc email or spreadsheet process into a structured, measurable operation.
Yes, the engine is designed to sit alongside your existing processor or gateway, receiving transaction data in real time to score and flag before or immediately after authorisation, depending on the latency your checkout flow can tolerate. Where your processor already provides some fraud signals, such as AVS or CVV match results, we incorporate those as inputs to our scoring rather than duplicating checks that are already available. This integration approach means adopting the engine does not require switching processors or rebuilding your checkout, which is usually a critical requirement for businesses evaluating a dedicated fraud solution. Data feeds for post-transaction analysis, such as chargebacks, are also integrated so the engine can learn from outcomes over time.
A first release with rule-based detection and case management typically takes 8 to 12 weeks, with scoring models requiring an additional data collection and training period before they can be deployed with confidence, often adding 4 to 8 weeks depending on data availability and quality. We recommend running new rules or models in shadow mode, scoring transactions without blocking, for a period before enforcing them, so you can validate performance against real traffic without risking customer impact. Ongoing tuning continues well beyond initial launch as fraud patterns evolve, and we typically offer this as part of a continuing engagement. The case management workflow can usually go live on day one, independent of the risk scoring model timeline.

Similar services